No fee unless we recoverHome & hospital visits

Leer en español한국어로 보기

Injuries

AMA Guides ch. 17 · § 4663 · § 4664

Hip fractures, labral tears and replacements

A hip fracture, labral tear or replacement is rated under AMA Guides Chapter 17. Arthritis gets blamed, and future medical care is often the largest decision.

Free, no obligationEnglish, Español, 한국어

THE SHORT ANSWER

There is no honest average for a hip settlement, because the number is built from a rating. California rates the hip under Chapter 17 of the AMA Guides, in lower extremity percent that converts to whole person at 40%. The rating schedule has separate entries for a replacement, a femoral neck fracture and a pelvic fracture, but none for a labral tear. In a hip case, two questions often decide the most: whether arthritis is used to cut the rating, and whether a settlement closes the future medical care a replaced hip may need.

On this page

In thirty seconds

  1. The hip is rated in the same chapter, under the same rules, as the knee and the ankle. Lower extremity percent converts to whole person at 40%, the methods cannot be stacked, and where more than one applies, the higher rating is adopted.
  2. Where the bone broke decides the code. The schedule has separate entries for the femoral neck, the femur and the pelvis. There is no entry for a labral tear, which is rated by what it left behind.
  3. Expect arthritis to be the argument against you. Under EscobedoEscobedo The en banc decision requiring an apportionment opinion to explain how and why. A percentage without reasoning is not substantial evidence., an apportionmentApportionment Dividing permanent disability between industrial and non-industrial causes. It is to disability, not to findings on an image. opinion has to explain how and why. A finding on an x-ray and a percentage is not enough.
  4. A replaced hip may need more surgery. A Compromise and ReleaseC&R — Compromise and Release A lump sum that closes future medical treatment permanently. closes future medical care permanently, and in a joint replacement case the structure of the settlement matters more than the amount.

Why there is no honest average

An average “hip injury settlement” is a number nobody can stand behind. A California settlement is built from the impairment rating, apportionment, your occupation and age, your earnings, and future medical care. In a hip case, the last of those can outweigh everything else. What the number is built from.

How a hip is rated

Permanent impairment of the hip is measured under Chapter 17 of the AMA Guides, 5th Edition, the same chapter as the knee and the ankle. Chapter 17 offers thirteen ways to evaluate a lower extremity: diagnosis-based estimates, range of motion, arthritis measured by cartilage interval, muscle atrophy, strength, gait derangement, and others. The result is stated in lower extremity percent and converted at 100% lower extremity = 40% whole person.

The rules for choosing are strict. Arthritis cannot be combined with range of motion, atrophy, strength, or gait. Atrophy, strength and gait derangement are mutually exclusive. Gait derangement is a last resort, used only when nothing else applies. And where more than one method applies, the Guides direct that the method producing the higher rating be adopted. The knee page walks through these rules.

The state’s rating schedule gives each method an impairment number. Around the hip:

WHERE · CODEWHAT THE SCHEDULE LISTS
Hip · 17.03Muscle atrophy, ankylosis, arthritis, range of motion, muscle strength, and “other.” Diagnosis-based entries for hip replacement, hip arthroplasty, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric bursitis
Pelvis · 17.02A diagnosis-based entry for fracture
Femur · 17.04A diagnosis-based entry for fracture
The whole leg · 17.01Limb length, amputation, skin loss, peripheral nerve, vascular, causalgia/RSD, and gait derangement

Summarized from the impairment number list in the 2005 Permanent DisabilityPD Permanent Disability. Compensation for lasting impairment. A different and much lower weekly rate — 2026 maximum $290/week. Rating Schedule. The list names methods, not values.

Notice what is not on it: a labral tear. As at the shoulder, there is no impairment entry for the tear itself. A labral tear is rated by what it left behind, usually lost motion, and a repair that restores motion leaves little to rate. If the joint also shows arthritic change, the arthritis method may rate higher, and where it does, it is the one to use.

One more thing worth checking: if the leg is shorter after a fracture or a replacement, limb length is its own method on the list. Ask whether it was measured.

Hip fractures, and the fall that caused them

Where it broke decides the code. What people call a broken hip can be a femoral neck fracture, a fracture of the femur, or a pelvic fracture, and the schedule lists each separately. Check that the code on your rating stringRating string The row of numbers encoding your entire permanent disability calculation. Checkable arithmetic. matches the bone the imaging and the operative report describe.

If a fall broke your hip, falls are the injury type most likely to produce a second claim against someone other than your employer. Photograph the condition that caused it before it is fixed. If you fell on property your employer does not own or control, or because equipment failed, there may be a premises or product claim. Workers’ compensation pays nothing for pain and suffering. A claim against anyone other than your employer does, and it is frequently the larger claim. I fell at work. · Third-party claims.

If you hit your head, say so now, even if you did not lose consciousness. Traumatic brain injury. And if you fell because an earlier work injury gave way, such as a knee or an ankle, the hip is a compensable consequenceCompensable consequence A new problem caused by the original injury or its treatment. Overusing the other side, the joint above or below, a surgical complication. of that injury. More.

Hip replacement and future medical care

A replacement has its own diagnosis-based entry. The knee page explains how a knee replacement is scored on its result, and why the post-operative assessment decides so much. Ask the same question about a hip: how was the result assessed, and does that match what you can actually do?

Authorization goes through utilization reviewUR Utilization Review. The process that approves, modifies, or denies each treatment request. A modification is a denial of what it left out.. A decision on a complete request is due within five business days. Since August 1, 2026, the treatment schedule has incorporated the Hip and Groin Disorders Guideline (ACOEM, January 29, 2026), at 8 CCR § 9792.23.10. If you get a denial, check which version it relies on. You have 30 days from service to request Independent Medical ReviewIMR Independent Medical Review. The appeal from a UR denial. 30 days (10 if the dispute is only over drugs on the MTUS Drug List)., or 10 days when the dispute is only about drugs on the MTUSMTUS Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule. California’s treatment guidelines. Four of them — shoulder, elbow, hand/wrist/forearm and traumatic brain injury — were replaced January 2, 2026. Drug List, and if the IMR form and an addressed envelope were not enclosed, the clock never started. A late utilization review decision is invalid, so a judge decides the treatment instead (Dubon II, WCABWCAB Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. The court system that decides these cases. 23 district offices statewide. en banc, 2014). How to check a denial. · I need surgery and they’re stalling.

The settlement decision is the one that costs the most if it goes wrong. A joint replacement has a service life, and hardware can fail. A Compromise and Release closes future medical treatment permanently. Stipulations with Request for AwardStips — Stipulations with Request for Award An agreed percentage paid over time, with future medical left open, and reopening available within five years of the date of injury. These are not two prices for the same thing. keep it open, and you keep the right to reopen for new and further disability within five years of the date of injuryDate of injury For a cumulative or occupational disease claim, the law sets it as when you first suffered disability and knew or should have known it was work-related — not when the wear began. Almost every deadline runs off this.. In a joint replacement case, that decision should not be made without a professionally prepared projection of lifetime cost.

If you are on Medicare, or heading toward it, settling future medical care brings Medicare’s interests into the settlement. If you are on Medicare. · Why the structure matters more than the number.

If the replacement fails, through dislocation, infection, hardware failure or a nerve injury, that disability belongs to the claim. Hikida v. WCAB (2017) treats disability caused by industrial medical treatment as industrial. But we will be straight with you about the limit. County of Santa Clara v. WCAB (Justice) (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 605 holds that Hikida “precludes apportionment only where the industrial medical treatment is the sole cause of the permanent disability.” In a hip replaced because of arthritis and an injury together, sole cause is a demanding test. The surgery made it worse.

The arthritis fight

Expect it, often in a paragraph like this:

THE PARAGRAPH TO LOOK FOR

“X-rays demonstrate joint space narrowing consistent with pre-existing degenerative arthritis. I apportion 50% of the permanent disability to the pre-existing degenerative condition.”

IT STATES A CONCLUSION, NOT AN ANALYSIS

The physician must state what approximate percentage of the permanent disability the injury caused and what percentage other factors caused. Under Escobedo v. Marshalls (WCAB en banc), the opinion must explain how and why. A percentage without reasoning is not substantial evidenceSubstantial evidence The standard a medical opinion must meet to support a finding..

IT APPORTIONS THE WRONG THING

Apportionment is to disability, not to pathology. Degenerative findings on imaging are common in people with no symptoms and no disability at all.

THE LAW IS NOT ALL ON YOUR SIDE

Under City of Petaluma v. WCAB (Lindh) (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 1175, a pre-existing condition that never disabled you can support apportionment. What the defense still has to prove is that it caused part of this disability. And a prior award is different again: the law conclusively presumes it still exists. That applies to a prior award, not to a prior injury or a prior x-ray.

  • Were you doing your full job the day before? — A worker on full duty without restriction had no disability from the pre-existing condition, whatever the x-ray showed.
  • Did the evaluator review your pre-injury records? — If the report’s records list has nothing from before the injury, say so.
  • What supports 50% rather than 20%? — The percentage has to be explained, not asserted.

And arthritis is not automatically non-industrial. If your hip wore out over years of the work rather than in one moment, that is a cumulative traumaCT — Cumulative trauma Injury from repeated exposure over time. The largest injury category in California and the least claimed. claim. The date of injury is when you first suffered disability and knew, or should have known, it was work-related — not when the wear began. Apportionment. · They say it’s arthritis. · Cumulative trauma.

From impairment to percentage

For injuries on or after January 1, 2013, the Division of Workers’ Compensation’s rating unit puts it this way: “The WP impairment will be multiplied by the 1.4 modifier, rounded to the nearest whole number, and then adjusted for occupation and age” (§ 4660.1(b)). Your occupational group is assigned by what you actually did all day, not your job title. Your age is your age at the date of injury, and older workers rate higher. How the adjustments work.

Before 2013, injuries were rated with an earning-capacity rank instead of the 1.4. In the schedule, the hip carries rank 5, against rank 2 for the knee, ankle and foot.

Read the string. A hip rated on range of motion produces a string beginning 17.03.04.00: Chapter 17, region 03 (hip), method 04 (range of motion). A replacement begins 17.03.10.01, and a femoral neck fracture 17.03.10.02. Decode yours.

Where every strict method misses, Almaraz/Guzman II (2009, WCAB en banc) lets a physician give the strict rating, explain why it fails, and use a more accurate method inside the Guides. It is an argument, not an entitlement. What it requires.

The back, the knee and the other hip

A hip injury changes your gait. The low back, the knee and the other hip absorb it, and the other leg carries the load. These are compensable consequences, but none of them is added on its own. Tell your treating doctor and make sure the note says why, tell the claims administrator in writing, and make sure the evaluator is asked about it before the examination. Discovery closes at the mandatory settlement conference and undisclosed evidence is generally inadmissible. How to add a body part.

If you cannot go back to your job

If the injury caused permanent partial disability and your employer does not offer regular, modified or alternative work within 60 days after the claims administrator receives the physician’s Return to Work & Voucher Report, you are owed a Supplemental Job Displacement Benefit: a $6,000 voucher for injuries on or after January 1, 2013. The voucher also opens the $5,000 Return-to-Work Supplement, and that application must be received within one year from the date the voucher was served on you. The voucher and the supplement.

The job itself is protected, if at all, by FEHA, which requires employers with five or more employees to reasonably accommodate a known disability and to engage in a timely, good-faith interactive process. Return to work.

The work that does it

Hip claims cluster where the work is deep bending and squatting, long shifts on concrete, load carried on the body, and climbing in and out: strawberry pickers working at ground level all shift; warehouse crews on ten-to-twelve-hour shifts on concrete; security officers on foot patrol with a duty belt, and on vehicle patrol; line cooks standing ten to twelve hours; Steadicam and handheld operators under a front-loaded rig; yard tractor drivers climbing in and out all shift. And falls, at any job. I was hurt on a ladder.

Frequently asked questions

What is the average workers’ comp settlement for a hip injury in California?

There is no honest figure. The settlement is built from your rating, apportionment, occupation, age, earnings and future medical care. In a replacement case, whether future medical care stays open can matter more than the rating.

I tore my hip labrum. What is it worth?

The tear itself has no impairment entry in the schedule. What carries value is what it left behind, usually lost motion, and if the joint is also arthritic, the arthritis method may rate higher.

I had a hip replacement. Should I keep future medical open?

It depends on your age, your treatment needs and whether Medicare is involved. But a replacement has a service life, and a Compromise and Release closes future medical permanently. Do not make that decision without a projection of lifetime cost.

They say my hip is just arthritis.

That is an apportionment argument, and it has to explain how and why the arthritis caused a percentage of your disability. A finding on an x-ray plus a number is not substantial evidence.

I fell at work and broke my hip. Can I sue anyone?

Not your employer, as a rule. But if the fall happened on someone else’s property, or because equipment failed, there may be a claim against them, and that claim pays for pain and suffering. Photograph the condition and ask in writing that the equipment be preserved.

Sources

AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition, ch. 17 (summarized, not reproduced)2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (Section 2 impairment numbers 17.01–17.04 and their earning-capacity ranks)DWC Disability Evaluation Unit, answers to questions about applying the PDRS (the 1.4 modifier)DWC, Permanent disability benefits8 CCR § 9792.9.3(b)§ 4610.5(h)(1)(B); 8 CCR § 9792.10.1(a)§ 4610.5(h)(1)(A)§ 4610.5(h)(3)§ 4664(b)§ 5502(d)(3)8 CCR § 10133.31(b)Gov. Code § 12940(m), (n)

Labor Code § 4610§ 4610.5§ 4658.7§ 4660.1§ 4663§ 4664§ 5410§ 5412§ 5502§ 3852 et seq. (third-party recovery)Government Code § 12940

8 CCR § 9792.9.3 (utilization review timeframes)§ 9792.10.1 (IMR filing deadlines)§ 9792.23.10 (Hip and Groin Disorders Guideline, ACOEM January 29, 2026; effective August 1, 2026)§ 10133.31 (voucher and qualifying offer)

DWC, Workers’ compensation benefits (voucher amount by date of injury)DIR, Return-to-Work Supplement Program

Almaraz/Guzman II (WCAB en banc, 2009)Dubon II (WCAB en banc, 2014)Escobedo v. Marshalls (WCAB en banc)Hikida v. WCAB (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1249City of Petaluma v. WCAB (Lindh) (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 1175County of Santa Clara v. WCAB (Justice) (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 605. Impairment methods are summarized, not reproduced; your rating depends on your own examination findings.

(213) 380-9310

General information about California law, not legal advice about your case.

Impairment values described are from the AMA Guides, 5th Edition as applied under the California rating schedule; the Guides are a copyrighted medical text and figures here are summarized rather than reproduced. Your rating depends on your own examination findings.

Reviewed by Jamey Teitell, Partner & Trial Attorney · Last reviewed

Law Offices of Solov & Teitell, APC · (213) 380-9310

Printed from https://www.solovteitell.com/injuries/hip/ · Last reviewed

BEFORE FUTURE MEDICAL IS SETTLED

Tell us what happened

A short call costs nothing and commits you to nothing. No fee unless we recover, and you are not responsible for costs we advance if there is no recovery. Free consultation in English, Spanish, or Korean.

CALL US · WE CALL BACK(213) 380-9310Free case review