THE SHORT ANSWER
Tennis elbow and golfer’s elbow have no value as diagnoses. They are rated on elbow motion, so if treatment works and motion returns, the permanent rating is zero, while treatment and temporary disability are still owed. Cubital tunnel is rated as a nerve entrapment and needs a positive nerve study. Temporary disability is capped at 104 compensable weeks within five years of the date of injury.
On this page
In thirty seconds
- Tennis elbow and golfer’s elbow have no diagnosis value. They are rated on elbow motion, so full motion is 0% — and treatment and temporary disabilityTD / TTD / TPD Temporary Disability, Total or Partial. Wage replacement while recovering. Two-thirds of average weekly earnings; 2026 maximum $1,764.11/week. are still owed.
- Cubital tunnel is rated as a nerve entrapment, by the same method as carpal tunnel, and it requires electrodiagnostic confirmation. Normal examination plus normal nerve study is no impairment.
- Most elbow claims have no accident. “It has hurt for years” describes a cumulative traumaCT — Cumulative trauma Injury from repeated exposure over time. The largest injury category in California and the least claimed. claim, not a reason the claim is late, and temporary disability is capped at 104 compensable weeks within five years of the date of injuryDate of injury For a cumulative or occupational disease claim, the law sets it as when you first suffered disability and knew or should have known it was work-related — not when the wear began. Almost every deadline runs off this..
The elbow sits between the two body parts people usually ask about, the shoulder and the hand, and it is rated by the same chapter. What decides an elbow case is usually one of four things: which rating method was used, whether a nerve study was done, whether the claim was filed as the cumulative injury it usually is, and how many weeks of temporary disability are left. Each is below.
How the elbow is rated
Chapter 16 of the AMA Guides, 5th Edition, covers the upper extremities, and California rates the elbow under it through the 2005 Permanent DisabilityPD Permanent Disability. Compensation for lasting impairment. A different and much lower weekly rate — 2026 maximum $290/week. Rating Schedule.
THE SCHEDULE HAS TWO ELBOW LINES
“Elbow/forearm – Range of motion” (16.03.01.00) and “Elbow/forearm – Other” (16.03.02.00). Nerve problems at the elbow are not on either line. They are rated as a peripheral neuropathy of the arm, and because carpal tunnel has its own line, an entrapment at the elbow falls under “Entrapment/compression – Other” (16.01.02.03). The first field of your rating stringRating string The row of numbers encoding your entire permanent disability calculation. Checkable arithmetic. tells you which approach was used.
APPROACH ONE: MOTION
Tennis elbow and golfer’s elbow have no diagnosis-based value. They are rated on elbow motion, and full motion is 0%. Stiffness after a fracture or surgery is motion loss, and motion loss is what this line rates.
APPROACH TWO: THE NERVE
Cubital tunnel, the ulnar nerve at the elbow, is rated by the same method as carpal tunnel, and it requires electrodiagnostic confirmation. Normal examination plus normal nerve study is no impairment. In compression neuropathies the Guides give no additional impairment for decreased grip strength. And when the same arm has both carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel, each is rated and the values are combined. How the nerve method works.
STRENGTH
Chapter 16 permits a strength rating “only in the rare case,” and not where there is decreased motion, pain, or deformity. The same rule at the shoulder.
THEN THE CONVERSIONS
An elbow impairment is stated in upper extremity percent and converted to whole person at 0.6. Suppose a report states 10% upper extremity: that is 6% whole person, and for an injury on or after January 1, 2013, 6 × 1.4 = 8.4, which rounds to 8, before occupation and age. The 10% is an illustration, not a value for any elbow. The 2005 schedule also converts and adjusts each part of an arm before combining it with the other parts, so an elbow and a shoulder on the same arm should not be merged into one number and adjusted once. Reading the string.
By condition
| CONDITION | HOW IT RATES |
|---|---|
| Lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) | No diagnosis value. Elbow motion only. Full motion = 0% |
| Medial epicondylitis (golfer’s elbow) | No diagnosis value. Elbow motion only. Full motion = 0% |
| Cubital tunnel (ulnar nerve at the elbow) | Nerve entrapment, same method as carpal tunnel. Needs a positive nerve study |
| Fracture | One of the two elbow lines: motion or “other.” Ask which Chapter 16 method sits behind the number |
| Ligament tear or instability | No line of its own in the schedule; it falls to motion or “other.” If the strict method misses real instability, that is the Almaraz/Guzman question |
A zero is not a finding that nothing happened. These conditions are real, they are compensable, and they entitle you to treatment and to temporary disability while you cannot work. If treatment works and your motion comes back, the permanent rating is zero. Knowing that in advance is better than discovering it at the end.
Where the strict number plainly fails, the law preserves Milpitas Unified School District v. WCABWCAB Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. The court system that decides these cases. 23 district offices statewide. (Guzman) (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 808. A physician may use a better method from within the Guides, but has to give the strict rating, explain why it fails, and explain why the alternative is more accurate. What that takes.
Repetitive work and cumulative trauma
Most elbow claims have no accident. The law defines a cumulative injury as one “occurring as repetitive mentally or physically traumatic activities extending over a period of time, the combined effect of which causes any disability or need for medical treatment.” Nothing has to go wrong on any particular day.
The date of injury is set by § 5412: the date the worker “first suffered disability therefrom and either knew, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known, that such disability was caused by his present or prior employment.” Pain is not disability. Under County of Riverside v. WCAB (Sylves) (2017), you are not charged with knowing it was work-related without medical advice to that effect — unless the nature of the injury and your own training, intelligence and qualifications mean you should have recognized the connection yourself. “It has hurt for years” describes a cumulative trauma claim. It is not a reason the claim is late. Cumulative trauma, in full.
For a physical injury, work only has to be a contributing cause. Not the only cause, and not the main one.
THE WORK THAT DOES IT
| WORK | WHAT THE ELBOW DOES |
|---|---|
| Garment work | Repeated rotation and gripping, with the elbow bent against the table edge: tennis and golfer’s elbow, cubital tunnel |
| Hotel housekeeping | High-force scrubbing, wringing rags, gripping spray triggers |
| Kitchens and coffee bars | Thousands of knife cycles, sauté pans, tamping and portafilter twisting |
| Warehouse picking | Hundreds of reach-and-grasp cycles an hour at a machine-paced rate |
| Longshore | Gripping and twisting turnbuckles |
| Film and TV electric | Pulling and coiling heavy cable for hours |
| Janitorial | Repeated forceful push and pull on vacuums |
What proves it is detail. A description of the actual physical demands, with frequencies and durations, and a medical opinion that names the mechanism. “Repetitive work” is not a mechanism.
THE APPORTIONMENT FIGHT
Expect the obvious one: that tennis elbow comes from tennis. Also age, diabetes, and old injuries. ApportionmentApportionment Dividing permanent disability between industrial and non-industrial causes. It is to disability, not to findings on an image. “shall be based on causation” (§ 4663(a)), and the employer is liable only for the percentage directly caused by the work. Under EscobedoEscobedo The en banc decision requiring an apportionment opinion to explain how and why. A percentage without reasoning is not substantial evidence., the physician has to explain how and why a weekend activity caused a percentage of your disability. A risk factor is not a cause, and a number without reasoning is not substantial evidenceSubstantial evidence The standard a medical opinion must meet to support a finding.. Apportionment.
Treatment disputes: utilization review and IMR
The elbow guideline changed on January 2, 2026. That day the MTUSMTUS Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule. California’s treatment guidelines. Four of them — shoulder, elbow, hand/wrist/forearm and traumatic brain injury — were replaced January 2, 2026. Elbow Disorders Guideline (ACOEM, July 14, 2025) took effect. A denial resting on the version it replaced is resting on something no longer in force.
Only a physician can deny. A person other than a licensed physician competent to evaluate the clinical issues may not modify or deny a request for medical necessity. A denial binds for 12 months as to the same treatment from the same physician or practice group, unless the new request is “supported by a documented change in the facts material to the basis of the utilization reviewUR Utilization Review. The process that approves, modifies, or denies each treatment request. A modification is a denial of what it left out. decision” (§ 4610(k)). A resubmission needs new evidence, not new wording.
The appeal is Independent Medical ReviewIMR Independent Medical Review. The appeal from a UR denial. 30 days (10 if the dispute is only over drugs on the MTUS Drug List)., and the deadlines are short. Thirty days after service of the denial, or 10 days for a formulary (drug) dispute. If the denial did not come with the notice the statute requires, the clock does not start until it is given.
The leverage is usually timeliness. In 2025, IMR upheld 89.8% of the denials it reviewed. Under Dubon II (WCAB en banc, 2014), a utilization review decision that was late is invalid, and the medical dispute goes to a judge instead. Utilization review. · IMR, and the honest odds. · I need surgery and they’re stalling.
Temporary disability: the § 4656(c) limits
For an injury on or after January 1, 2008, temporary disability “shall not extend for more than 104 compensable weeks within a period of five years from the date of injury”. Not five years from the first check. Five years from the date of injury.
The 240-week exception is a closed list of nine conditions in § 4656(c)(3): hepatitis B, hepatitis C, amputations, severe burns, HIV, high-velocity eye injuries, chemical burns to the eyes, pulmonary fibrosis, and chronic lung disease. An ordinary elbow injury is not on it, and there is no catch-all.
The weeks run while the case is fought. Weeks of temporary partial disability on modified duty count against the same 104, and § 4656(c) has no exception for time spent waiting out a denied surgery. If your surgery is delayed, count your weeks now. Temporary disability.
The rate is two-thirds of your average weekly earnings, between $264.61 and $1,764.11 a week for a 2026 injury.
What to do now
- Report it in writing, even with no incident — A cumulative injury is reported like any other.
- Describe the work in numbers — What motion, how many times an hour, with what force, for how many hours, for how many years.
- If your hand or fingers go numb, ask about a nerve conduction study — For cubital tunnel, as for carpal tunnel, a normal study means no nerve rating.
- Get restrictions in writing — Lifting, gripping, forearm rotation, repetitive use. If the doctor won’t write them.
- Claim the other arm if it starts to hurt — Overuse of the uninjured side is a compensable consequenceCompensable consequence A new problem caused by the original injury or its treatment. Overusing the other side, the joint above or below, a surgical complication., and it has to be reported. How.
- After any denial, find the service date — Thirty days, or ten for a drug, and check whether the IMR application was enclosed.
Frequently asked questions
What is the average settlement for an elbow injury?
There is no honest average. The number depends on the method used, the motion or nerve loss measured, your occupation, your age, your date of injury, and apportionment. For tennis or golfer’s elbow with full motion restored, the strict rating is zero.
My tennis elbow got better. Why is my rating zero?
Because the condition has no diagnosis value and is rated on motion, and your motion came back. The treatment and the time off were still owed.
I play tennis on weekends. Does that end my claim?
No. For a physical injury, work only has to be a contributing cause. Weekend activity is an apportionment argument, and the physician has to explain how and why it caused a percentage of the disability.
My nerve study was normal, but my fingers go numb.
Under the strict method that produces no nerve rating. It does not affect your right to treatment, and it does not mean nobody believes you.
How long can I be paid while I’m off work?
Up to 104 compensable weeks within five years of the date of injury, for injuries on or after January 1, 2008. An ordinary elbow injury is not one of the nine conditions that get 240 weeks.
Sources
AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition, ch. 162005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule (Section 1: upper extremity conversion and combining; Section 2: impairment numbers)8 CCR § 9792.23.3 (MTUS Elbow Disorders Guideline, operative January 2, 2026)Labor Code § 3208.1§ 4610§ 4610.5§ 4653§ 4656§ 4660.1§ 4663§ 4664§ 5412DIR Newsline 2025-116 (2026 temporary disability rates)DWC 2026 IMR Report (2025 data)Milpitas Unified School District v. WCAB (Guzman) (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 808Almaraz/Guzman II (2009, WCAB en banc)County of Riverside v. WCAB (Sylves) (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 119Dubon II (WCAB en banc, 2014)Escobedo v. Marshalls (WCAB en banc)§ 4660.1(h)Labor Code § 3208.1(b)§ 4664(a)§ 4610(g)(3)(A)§ 4610.5(h)(1)§ 4610.5(h)(3)§ 4656(c)(2). Impairment values are summarized, not reproduced; your rating depends on your own examination findings.
(213) 380-9310
General information about California law, not legal advice about your case.
Impairment values described are from the AMA Guides, 5th Edition as applied under the California rating schedule; the Guides are a copyrighted medical text and figures here are summarized rather than reproduced. Your rating depends on your own examination findings.
Reviewed by Jamey Teitell, Partner & Trial Attorney · Last reviewed
Law Offices of Solov & Teitell, APC · (213) 380-9310
Printed from https://www.solovteitell.com/injuries/elbow/ · Last reviewed