No fee unless we recoverHome & hospital visits

Common questions

“I already had diabetes. Does that ruin my claim?”

A pre-existing condition does not disqualify you. It changes the apportionment argument — and most apportionment opinions do not survive scrutiny.

Call now (213) 380-9310Free case review

Leer en español한국어로 보기

The short answer

No. A pre-existing condition does not disqualify you, and the employer takes you as it finds you.

What it does is create an apportionmentApportionment Dividing permanent disability between industrial and non-industrial causes. It is to disability, not to findings on an image. argument — and a large share of apportionment opinions do not survive being read carefully.

On this page

The rule

You do not have to be healthy to be covered. If work caused or contributed to your disability, that portion is compensable, and a pre-existing condition that made you more vulnerable does not defeat the claim.

What the carrier will do instead is apportion — attribute part of your permanent disabilityPD Permanent Disability. Compensation for lasting impairment. A different and much lower weekly rate — 2026 maximum $290/week. to the non-industrial condition, reducing what it owes.

Why most apportionment opinions fail

Under EscobedoEscobedo The en banc decision requiring an apportionment opinion to explain how and why. A percentage without reasoning is not substantial evidence., an apportionment opinion must be substantial evidenceSubstantial evidence The standard a medical opinion must meet to support a finding.. That means the physician has to explain how and why the non-industrial factor caused a specific percentage of the permanent disability.

A sentence that says “50% apportioned to pre-existing degenerative disease” and stops is not substantial evidence. It is a conclusion without reasoning, and it does not survive a proper challenge.

A very large number of apportionment opinions are exactly that sentence. What makes one hold up.

And note the direction of travel: after Lindh, an asymptomatic pre-existing condition — including a genetic predisposition — can support apportionment. So the argument is real and it has to be met on the reasoning, not dismissed.

Conditions that come up most

Diabetes — relevant to healing, neuropathy, infection risk, and amputation. It also makes some injuries far worse, and worsening caused by the industrial injury is compensable even where the underlying condition is not.

Degenerative disc disease and arthritis — present in most adults over forty and used constantly. That page.

Prior surgeries and prior injuries, including a prior award, which raises § 4664(b) and a presumption that the prior disability continues.

Obesity, hypertension, and cardiac conditions, particularly in heat and exertion cases.

The thing to do, and it is counterintuitive

Disclose everything, early, in your own words.

People hide prior conditions out of fear they will be used against them. They will be found — the records exist, and they will be obtained. Disclosed late, they look like concealment and they damage your credibility, which in a disputed case is close to the whole case. Disclosed early, they are just facts, and they may be the most valuable facts you have.

Because here is the other side of it: where a pre-existing disability combines with a new work injury to leave you far more disabled than either alone, the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundSIBTF Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund. Pays where a pre-existing disability plus an industrial injury produce a substantially greater disability. Rewritten by SB 171 in July 2026. exists to pay that difference. Disability apportioned away from your employer is often precisely the disability SIBTF is designed to address. How that works.

They stopped something, or won’t start it

Delays, denials, and checks that never came.

Common Questions

Sources

Labor Code § 4663 (apportionment to causation)§ 4664 (employer liability limited to the percentage caused by the industrial injury; subdivision (b) on prior awards)§ 4660.1 (permanent disability)§ 3202 (liberal construction)§ 4751 (Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund)Escobedo v. Marshalls (2005) 70 Cal.Comp.Cases 604 (en banc)City of Jackson v. WCAB (2017) and City of Petaluma v. WCAB (Lindh) (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 1175 on asymptomatic and genetic factors.

General information about California law, not legal advice about your case.

Impairment values described are from the AMA Guides, 5th Edition as applied under the California rating schedule; the Guides are a copyrighted medical text and figures here are summarized rather than reproduced. Your rating depends on your own examination findings.

Reviewed by Jamey Teitell, Partner & Trial Attorney · Last reviewed

Law Offices of Solov & Teitell, APC · (213) 380-9310

Printed from https://www.solovteitell.com/answers/i-have-diabetes-or-another-condition/ · Last reviewed

A SHORT CALL COSTS NOTHING

Tell us what happened

A short call costs nothing and commits you to nothing. No fee unless we recover, and you are not responsible for costs we advance if there is no recovery. Free consultation in English, Spanish, or Korean.

CALL US · WE CALL BACK(213) 380-9310Free case review